This begins to connect reality with the mind.

And if such a process is possible, then increasing compliance results from the experimental results, then the subjective experimenter effect grows in strength in the form of increasing expectation of what the experiment will suggest.

In this way, the consistency of reality increases. And there is no other way to know whether experimental data are irrefutable or have succumbed to subjective contamination—which, of course, makes the "material" world of science essentially a mental model of the world, experienced as a manipulated reality.

Indeed, particle theory takes this process into account. The "observer effect" suggests that for subatomic phenomena to become "reality," the "observation" must be performed by a form of consciousness. And it is this consciousness that defines what reality is.

Of course, science would suggest that the whole idea is rubbish. However, scientists would use the idea without exploiting it. In their reality, the material world has no place for such a concept, so it doesn't exist there.

Still, maybe some people know better.