In this sense, publishing such recordings borders on abuse of credibility and can be considered the spread of unverified, potentially false information. While this concerns the realm of metaphysics, the law doesn't respond to it as classic fake news, from the perspective of information ethics, it's problematic. This is especially true given that the victims of such disinformation (i.e., deceased individuals) are no longer able to correct anything themselves, and their loved ones often lack the strength or resources to combat such content.
The purely cognitive aspect of credibility also cannot be ignored : the vast majority of scientists and paranormal researchers agree that there is no convincing evidence that voices in EVP recordings actually come from spirits. Any such recording can be explained by natural causes or hoax.
Despite this, internet creators rarely post any disclaimers on this matter. Few say outright, "Warning: this is just an entertainment experiment, take it with a grain of salt." Usually, the opposite is true – the tone is serious, the narrative sensational, and the fictional nature is never explicitly acknowledged. As a result, some viewers genuinely believe, for example, that the recently deceased Ozzy Osbourne "spoke from beyond the grave" via a spirit box. Disinformation and informational confusion are real side effects of ill-considered play with the ghost theme.
The credibility of messages purportedly coming from the dead is therefore negligible, bordering on zero. Publicizing them as sensational truth constitutes a form of public manipulation , and publicly attributing to the dead words they never uttered is an abuse of their memory . Just because it's technically impossible to prove a forgery (because how can you prove something is n't the voice of a ghost?) doesn't mean that such fiction should be tacitly accepted.
Brak komentarzy:
Prześlij komentarz